GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon HD 7690M XT
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon HD 7690M XT, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460 v2 stacks up against Radeon HD 7690M XT, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon HD 7690M XT is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7690M XT is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7690M XT here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon HD 7690M XT | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 25 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 540% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon HD 7690M XT has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 7690M XT - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 7690M XT - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 54 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon HD 7690M XT are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 v2 is 408 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 160% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Battlefield 5 is 155% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7690M XT in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7690M XT in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Dota 2 is 42% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Far Cry 5 is 225% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Fortnite is 84% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Forza Horizon 4 is 111% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Grand Theft Auto V is 72% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Metro Exodus is 266% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Minecraft is 16% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 44% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 v2 in World of Tanks is 35% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon HD 7690M XT | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Terascale 2 |
Code name | GF114 | Thames XTX |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 7 June 2011 |
Pipelines | 336 | 480 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 725 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 716 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 17.40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 696.0 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Quadro 5010M
- Radeon HD 7690M XT vs Iris Pro Graphics P580
- Radeon HD 7690M XT vs Quadro 5010M
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs HD Graphics 5000
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs FirePro M4150
- Radeon HD 7690M XT vs HD Graphics 5000
- Radeon HD 7690M XT vs FirePro M4150