Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon HD 7690M XT
In this comparison between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon HD 7690M XT you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro FX 3800 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 7690M XT will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro FX 3800
Radeon HD 7690M XT is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7690M XT is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7690M XT here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 7690M XT | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | 25 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 332% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Radeon HD 7690M XT has 1 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 7690M XT - in Laptops.
- Quadro FX 3800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 7690M XT - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 7690M XT is 125 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7690M XT - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 7690M XT is 2000 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7690M XT in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7690M XT in Battlefield 5 is 125% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7690M XT in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7690M XT in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7690M XT in Dota 2 is 19% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7690M XT in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7690M XT in Fortnite is 34% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7690M XT in Forza Horizon 4 is 83% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7690M XT in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7690M XT in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7690M XT in Minecraft is 24% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7690M XT in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 12% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7690M XT in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | − | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7690M XT in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 133% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7690M XT in World of Tanks is 14% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 7690M XT | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Terascale 2 |
| Code name | GT200B | Thames XTX |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 | 7 June 2011 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 480 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 716 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.40 | 17.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 696.0 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |