Quadro T1000 vs Radeon HD 7690M XT
In this comparison between Quadro T1000 and Radeon HD 7690M XT you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro T1000 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 7690M XT will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro T1000
Radeon HD 7690M XT is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7690M XT is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7690M XT here:
Main Specs
Quadro T1000 | Radeon HD 7690M XT | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 25 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro T1000 has 100% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
- Quadro T1000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 7690M XT uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro T1000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 7690M XT - in Laptops.
- Quadro T1000 is build with Turing architecture, and Radeon HD 7690M XT - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 670 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
- Quadro T1000 is manufactured by 12 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7690M XT - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro T1000 is 4400 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro T1000 and Radeon HD 7690M XT have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 185% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Dota 2 is 134% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Fortnite is 443% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Minecraft is 44% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro T1000 in World of Tanks is 71% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. |
Full Specs
Quadro T1000 | Radeon HD 7690M XT | |
Architecture | Turing | Terascale 2 |
Code name | TU117 | Thames XTX |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 27 May 2019 | 7 June 2011 |
Pipelines | 480 | |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 725 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1455 MHz | |
Transistor count | 4,700 million | 716 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.40 | |
Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |