Radeon HD 7690M XT vs Tesla M10
In this comparison between Radeon HD 7690M XT and Tesla M10 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon HD 7690M XT will be the best choice, for others Tesla M10 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M10
Radeon HD 7690M XT is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7690M XT is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7690M XT here:
Main Specs
Radeon HD 7690M XT | Tesla M10 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M10 has 800% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
- Radeon HD 7690M XT is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Tesla M10 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M10 has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
- Radeon HD 7690M XT is used in Laptops, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 7690M XT is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 308 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
- Radeon HD 7690M XT is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Tesla M10 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M10 is 1600 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7690M XT.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 340% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 344% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 111% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 22% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 97% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 200% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 277% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 177% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 600% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 27% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 433% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 500% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than Radeon HD 7690M XT. |
Full Specs
Radeon HD 7690M XT | Tesla M10 | |
Architecture | Terascale 2 | Maxwell |
Code name | Thames XTX | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 7 June 2011 | 18 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 480 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1306 MHz | |
Transistor count | 716 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 52.24 |
Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 5200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |