Radeon HD 7730M vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
In this comparison between Radeon HD 7730M and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon HD 7730M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
Radeon HD 7730M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7730M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7730M here:
Main Specs
Radeon HD 7730M | Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 7730M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 7730M and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri are build with GCN architecture.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri is 145 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7730M.
- Radeon HD 7730M and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than Radeon HD 7730M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7730M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 260% more, than Radeon HD 7730M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7730M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Dota 2 is 158% more, than Radeon HD 7730M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Fortnite is 204% more, than Radeon HD 7730M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than Radeon HD 7730M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Minecraft is 79% more, than Radeon HD 7730M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than Radeon HD 7730M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | − | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in World of Tanks is 128% more, than Radeon HD 7730M. |
Full Specs
Radeon HD 7730M | Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri | |
Architecture | GCN | GCN |
Code name | Lombok GL | Kaveri Spectre |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 24 April 2012 | 14 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 720 MHz |
Boost Clock | 675 MHz | |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 21.60 | |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | + |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 70 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon HD 7730M vs GeForce GT 740A
- Radeon HD 7730M vs GeForce 820A
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs GeForce GT 740A
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs GeForce 820A
- Radeon HD 7730M vs Radeon HD 4890
- Radeon HD 7730M vs GeForce GTX 675MX
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs Radeon HD 4890
- Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri vs GeForce GTX 675MX