FireStream 9270 vs Radeon HD 7750M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9270 and Radeon HD 7750M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9270 and Radeon HD 7750M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9270
Radeon HD 7750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7750M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Radeon HD 7750M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 28 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 471% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7750M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FireStream 9270 and Radeon HD 7750M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 7750M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon HD 7750M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 175 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7750M.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7750M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 7750M is 400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 16% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Battlefield 5 is 30% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9270 and Radeon HD 7750M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7750M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Dota 2 is 5% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| FireStream 9270 and Radeon HD 7750M have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Forza Horizon 4 is 25% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Grand Theft Auto V is 16% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Minecraft is 5% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7750M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 38% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 42% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 25% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Radeon HD 7750M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | GCN |
| Code name | RV770 | Lombok XL |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 24 April 2012 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 18.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 588.8 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |