GRID K520 vs Radeon HD 7750M
When choosing between GRID K520 and Radeon HD 7750M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GRID K520 and Radeon HD 7750M.
GRID K520
Radeon HD 7750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7750M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K520 | Radeon HD 7750M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 28 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K520 has 703% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7750M.
- GRID K520 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 7750M uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GRID K520 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7750M.
- GRID K520 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 7750M - in Laptops.
- GRID K520 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 7750M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GRID K520 is 170 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7750M.
- GRID K520 and Radeon HD 7750M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K520 is 1000 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7750M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Battlefield 5 is 230% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID K520 and Radeon HD 7750M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−35 | − |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 93% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Dota 2 is 72% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Far Cry 5 is 316% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Fortnite is 142% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Forza Horizon 4 is 250% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 80−85 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Grand Theft Auto V is 142% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 216% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 250% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K520 in World of Tanks is 66% more, than Radeon HD 7750M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K520 | Radeon HD 7750M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
| Code name | GK104 | Lombok XL |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 July 2013 | 24 April 2012 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 575 MHz |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 18.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 2,448 gflops | 588.8 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 76 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |