FirePro S9000 vs Radeon HD 7770M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro S9000 and Radeon HD 7770M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro S9000 stacks up against Radeon HD 7770M, check out specs charts below.
FirePro S9000
Radeon HD 7770M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7770M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7770M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9000 | Radeon HD 7770M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | 32 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S9000 has 993% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7770M.
- FirePro S9000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 7770M uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro S9000 has 5 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7770M.
- FirePro S9000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 7770M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S9000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 7770M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 225 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7770M.
- FirePro S9000 and Radeon HD 7770M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S9000 is 1500 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7770M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 241% more, than Radeon HD 7770M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Battlefield 5 is 257% more, than Radeon HD 7770M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 7770M. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 98% more, than Radeon HD 7770M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon HD 7770M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Dota 2 is 66% more, than Radeon HD 7770M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Far Cry 5 is 291% more, than Radeon HD 7770M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Fortnite is 200% more, than Radeon HD 7770M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 270% more, than Radeon HD 7770M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 158% more, than Radeon HD 7770M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Metro Exodus is 287% more, than Radeon HD 7770M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Minecraft is 28% more, than Radeon HD 7770M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 84% more, than Radeon HD 7770M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Radeon HD 7770M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 287% more, than Radeon HD 7770M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9000 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than Radeon HD 7770M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S9000 | Radeon HD 7770M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN |
Code name | Tahiti | Chelsea XT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 24 August 2012 | 24 April 2012 |
Pipelines | 1792 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 900 MHz | 675 MHz |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 100.8 | 21.60 |
Floating-point performance | 3,226 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 264 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |