GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon HD 7770M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 7770M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 SE will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 7770M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon HD 7770M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7770M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7770M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon HD 7770M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 32 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 368% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7770M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 7770M have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 7770M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon HD 7770M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 625 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7770M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7770M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 7770M is 2300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 7770M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 7770M have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 7770M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 1% more, than Radeon HD 7770M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 7770M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 1% more, than Radeon HD 7770M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 7770M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 7770M have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 5% more, than Radeon HD 7770M. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 5% more, than Radeon HD 7770M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 7770M have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 2% more, than Radeon HD 7770M. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 4% more, than Radeon HD 7770M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 8% more, than Radeon HD 7770M. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 6% more, than Radeon HD 7770M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 7770M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon HD 7770M | |
Architecture | Fermi | GCN |
Code name | GF104 | Chelsea XT |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 24 April 2012 |
Pipelines | 288 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 675 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 21.60 |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 470M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Quadro M600M
- Radeon HD 7770M vs GeForce GTX 470M
- Radeon HD 7770M vs Quadro M600M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs GeForce GTX 760M
- GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200
- Radeon HD 7770M vs GeForce GTX 760M
- Radeon HD 7770M vs Iris Pro Graphics 6200