FireStream 9270 vs Radeon HD 7850M
In this comparison between FireStream 9270 and Radeon HD 7850M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9270 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 7850M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9270
Radeon HD 7850M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7850M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7850M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Radeon HD 7850M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 300% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7850M.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon HD 7850M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9270 and Radeon HD 7850M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 7850M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon HD 7850M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 75 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7850M.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7850M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 7850M is 400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7850M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 14% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| FireStream 9270 and Radeon HD 7850M have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7850M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 2% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7850M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| FireStream 9270 and Radeon HD 7850M have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| FireStream 9270 and Radeon HD 7850M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7850M in Fortnite is 10% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7850M in Forza Horizon 4 is 7% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| FireStream 9270 and Radeon HD 7850M have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7850M in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Minecraft is 2% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7850M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| FireStream 9270 and Radeon HD 7850M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7850M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 8% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7850M in World of Tanks is 9% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Radeon HD 7850M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | GCN |
| Code name | RV770 | Heathrow Pro |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 24 April 2012 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 675 MHz |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 27.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 864.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |