Radeon HD 7850M vs Tesla C2050
In this comparison between Radeon HD 7850M and Tesla C2050 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon HD 7850M will be the best choice, for others Tesla C2050 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla C2050
Radeon HD 7850M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7850M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7850M here:
Main Specs
Radeon HD 7850M | Tesla C2050 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 495% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7850M.
- Radeon HD 7850M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2050 has 1 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7850M.
- Radeon HD 7850M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 7850M is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 7850M is 101 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- Radeon HD 7850M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 7850M is 1000 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 175% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 184% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 97% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 37% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 70% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 119% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 175% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 110% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 57% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 144% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 176% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Radeon HD 7850M. |
Full Specs
Radeon HD 7850M | Tesla C2050 | |
Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
Code name | Heathrow Pro | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 24 April 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 675 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 27.00 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 864.0 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 90 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |