GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 7870M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon HD 7870M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon HD 7870M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 295
Radeon HD 7870M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7870M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7870M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon HD 7870M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 542% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7870M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon HD 7870M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1790 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7870M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 7870M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 295 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 7870M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 442 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7870M.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7870M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 7870M is 3001 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7870M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7870M in Battlefield 5 is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7870M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7870M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7870M in Dota 2 is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7870M in Far Cry 5 is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7870M in Fortnite is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7870M in Forza Horizon 4 is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7870M in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7870M in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7870M in Minecraft is 5% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7870M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7870M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7870M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7870M in World of Tanks is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon HD 7870M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GT200B | Heathrow XT |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 8 January 2009 | 24 April 2012 |
| Pipelines | 240 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | 32.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | 1,024 gflops |
| Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 480 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
| Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
| Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
| Check Price |