FirePro M4150 vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
When comparing FirePro M4150 and Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M4150 and Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro M4150
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire here:
Main Specs
FirePro M4150 | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 200 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- FirePro M4150 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire - in Laptops.
- FirePro M4150 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is 135 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
- FirePro M4150 and Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is 800 MHz higher, than FirePro M4150.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 683% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Battlefield 5 is 688% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro M4150 and Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 195% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Dota 2 is 139% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Far Cry 5 is 1075% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Fortnite is 443% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Forza Horizon 4 is 728% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Grand Theft Auto V is 361% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Metro Exodus is 1266% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Minecraft is 44% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1016% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 9−10 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1140% more, than FirePro M4150. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in World of Tanks is 71% more, than FirePro M4150. |
Full Specs
FirePro M4150 | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN |
Code name | Opal | Wimbledon XT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 16 October 2013 | 1 May 2012 |
Pipelines | 384 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 715 MHz | 850 MHz |
Transistor count | 950 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.16 | |
Floating-point performance | 549.1 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | DirectX 11.1, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro M4150 vs Radeon HD 7690M XT
- FirePro M4150 vs GeForce 830A
- Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire vs Radeon HD 7690M XT
- Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire vs GeForce 830A
- FirePro M4150 vs Quadro T2000 mobile
- FirePro M4150 vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire vs Quadro T2000 mobile
- Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL