FireStream 9250 vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
In this comparison between FireStream 9250 and Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9250 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9250
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 200 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire has 33% more power consumption, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is 225 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is 2814 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 720% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Battlefield 5 is 655% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9250 and Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 168% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Dota 2 is 121% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Far Cry 5 is 840% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Fortnite is 411% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Forza Horizon 4 is 536% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Grand Theft Auto V is 295% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Metro Exodus is 925% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Minecraft is 55% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 155% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 500% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 675% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in World of Tanks is 55% more, than FireStream 9250. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire | |
Architecture | TeraScale | GCN |
Code name | RV770 | Wimbledon XT |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 1 May 2012 |
Pipelines | 800 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 850 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | DirectX 11.1, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 4.1 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 650M
- FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GT 640
- Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire vs GeForce GT 650M
- Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire vs GeForce GT 640
- FireStream 9250 vs Quadro T2000 mobile
- FireStream 9250 vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire vs Quadro T2000 mobile
- Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL