GRID K260Q vs Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GRID K260Q and Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GRID K260Q stacks up against Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire, check out specs charts below.
GRID K260Q
Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire here:
Main Specs
GRID K260Q | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 200 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GRID K260Q has 12% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire.
- GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire - in Laptops.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire is 105 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- GRID K260Q and Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 200 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Battlefield 5 is 134% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 46% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Far Cry 5 is 147% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 95−100 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Fortnite is 107% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Grand Theft Auto V is 88% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Minecraft is 18% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 35% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 111% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 148% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire in World of Tanks is 4% more, than GRID K260Q. |
Full Specs
GRID K260Q | Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire | |
Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
Code name | GK104 | Wimbledon XT |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 28 June 2013 | 1 May 2012 |
Pipelines | 1536 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 850 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | DirectX 11.1, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GRID K260Q vs Radeon HD 6970
- GRID K260Q vs Radeon HD 6990
- Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire vs Radeon HD 6970
- Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire vs Radeon HD 6990
- GRID K260Q vs Quadro T2000 mobile
- GRID K260Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire vs Quadro T2000 mobile
- Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL