GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon HD 7970M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 7970M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 7970M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon HD 7970M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7970M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7970M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon HD 7970M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 50% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7970M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon HD 7970M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- Radeon HD 7970M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 7970M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon HD 7970M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 450 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7970M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7970M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 7970M is 3100 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 83% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M in Battlefield 5 is 94% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 51% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M in Dota 2 is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M in Fortnite is 73% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M in Forza Horizon 4 is 88% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M in Metro Exodus is 87% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 53% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 76% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 7970M in World of Tanks is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon HD 7970M | |
Architecture | Fermi | GCN |
Code name | GF104 | Wimbledon XT |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 November 2010 | 1 May 2012 |
Pipelines | 288 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 850 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 2,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 68.00 |
Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 2,176 gflops |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 153.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | 254 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |