GeForce GTX 260 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 260 and Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 260 stacks up against Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics, check out specs charts below.
Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 260
Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
Power consumption (TDP)
182 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
896 MB
Display Connectors
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 260 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics - in Laptops.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 260 is 522 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics.
GeForce GTX 260 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics - by 32 / 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics is 801 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 260.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
3−4
1−2
ultra / 1080p
1−2
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
12−14
medium / 1080p
5−6
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics.
high / 1080p
7−8
−
ultra / 1080p
6−7
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
14−16
medium / 1080p
8−9
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Battlefield 5 is 71% more, than Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
low / 768p
120−130
110−120
medium / 768p
95−100
85−90
ultra / 1080p
45−50
35−40
QHD / 1440p
24−27
21−24
4K / 2160p
−
9−10
high / 768p
70−75
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics.
low / 768p
70−75
65−70
ultra / 1080p
20−22
18−20
medium / 1080p
40−45
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics.
low / 768p
75−80
70−75
medium / 768p
55−60
45−50
ultra / 1080p
27−30
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Dota 2 is 17% more, than Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics.
high / 1080p
4−5
2−3
ultra / 1080p
3−4
1−2
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
14−16
9−10
medium / 1080p
5−6
3−4
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics.
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
7−8
4−5
QHD / 1440p
4−5
0−1
low / 720p
55−60
50−55
medium / 1080p
16−18
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Fortnite is 22% more, than Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics.
high / 1080p
7−8
4−5
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
21−24
14−16
medium / 1080p
9−10
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Forza Horizon 4 is 44% more, than Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics.
low / 768p
45−50
40−45
medium / 768p
−
35−40
high / 1080p
9−10
4−5
ultra / 1080p
3−4
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
40−45
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Grand Theft Auto V is 25% more, than Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics.
high / 1080p
2−3
1−2
ultra / 1080p
0−1
0−1
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
8−9
3−4
medium / 1080p
3−4
2−3
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics.
low / 768p
85−90
85−90
high / 1080p
65−70
75−80
4K / 2160p
−
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics in Minecraft is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 260.
ultra / 1080p
12−14
12−14
low / 720p
27−30
24−27
medium / 1080p
14−16
12−14
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
4−5
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
−
low / 720p
7−8
4−5
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 75% more, than Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics.
low / 768p
18−20
10−11
medium / 768p
12−14
8−9
high / 1080p
6−7
3−4
ultra / 1080p
4−5
3−4
4K / 2160p
1−2
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 260 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics.
low / 768p
70−75
75−80
medium / 768p
35−40
35−40
ultra / 1080p
16−18
12−14
high / 768p
30−35
27−30
GeForce GTX 260 and Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics have the same average FPS in World of Tanks.
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 260
Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Code name
GT200
Type
Desktop
Laptop
Release date
16 June 2008
1 August 2013
Pipelines
192
640
Core clock speed
1242 MHz
720 / 825 MHz
Transistor count
1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
32 / 28 nm
Texture fill rate
36.9 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
476.9 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
448 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
999 MHz
1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
111.9 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX 11, Shader 5.0
Shader Model
4.0
OpenGL
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
192
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
30 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Check Price
Check Price