GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 280
Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 236 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 280 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics - in Laptops.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 280 is 576 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics.
- GeForce GTX 280 is manufactured by 65 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics - by 32 / 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics is 693 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 280.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Battlefield 5 is 28% more, than Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 280. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 10% more, than Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Dota 2 is 10% more, than Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Fortnite is 4% more, than Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics. | ||
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
GeForce GTX 280 and Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Minecraft is 9% more, than Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics. | ||
low / 768p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
medium / 768p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 16% more, than Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 280 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 280 | Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | |
Code name | GT200 | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 1 August 2013 |
Pipelines | 240 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 1296 MHz | 720 / 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 32 / 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 48.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1107 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 141.7 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 240 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Quadro K2000M
- Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics vs Radeon R6 Carrizo
- Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics vs Quadro K2000M
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon HD 4850
- GeForce GTX 280 vs Radeon R9 A375
- Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics vs Radeon HD 4850
- Radeon HD 8550G plus HD 8750M Dual Graphics vs Radeon R9 A375