GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
When choosing between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTX 295 and Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
GeForce GTX 295
Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 289 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1792 MB | |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics - in Laptops.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 522 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
- GeForce GTX 295 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics - by 32 / 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics is 801 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Battlefield 5 is 57% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics in Call of Duty: Warzone is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | − |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Far Cry 5 is 80% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Fortnite is 25% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Forza Horizon 4 is 71% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Grand Theft Auto V is 23% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 140% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 295 | Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | |
Code name | GT200B | |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 8 January 2009 | 1 August 2013 |
Pipelines | 240 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 1242 MHz | 720 / 775 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 32 / 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 92.2 billion/sec | |
Floating-point performance | 2x 596.2 gflops | |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 896 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 999 MHz | 1800 - 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 223.8 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R9 M275
- Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
- Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics vs Radeon R9 M275
- GeForce GTX 295 vs Radeon R7 A265
- GeForce GTX 295 vs GeForce GT 645M
- Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics vs Radeon R7 A265
- Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics vs GeForce GT 645M