Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
In this comparison between Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro FX 3800 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro FX 3800
Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics here:
Main Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 108 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | |
Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics - in Laptops.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics is 120 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- Quadro FX 3800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics - by 32 / 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics is 200 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics in Battlefield 5 is 75% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
Quadro FX 3800 and Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics in Dota 2 is 7% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics in Far Cry 5 is 66% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics in Fortnite is 17% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics in Forza Horizon 4 is 16% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics in Minecraft is 2% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 6% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
medium / 768p | − | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 66% more, than Quadro FX 3800. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics in World of Tanks is 11% more, than Quadro FX 3800. |
Full Specs
Quadro FX 3800 | Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics | |
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | |
Code name | GT200B | |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 30 March 2009 | 1 August 2013 |
Pipelines | 192 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 720 / 775 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 32 / 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 38.40 | |
Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | |
Length | 198 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 1800 - 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 |
Shader Model | 4.0 | |
OpenGL | 3.3 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 1.3 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Quadro FX 3800 vs GeForce GT 440
- Quadro FX 3800 vs Quadro K600
- Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics vs GeForce GT 440
- Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics vs Quadro K600
- Quadro FX 3800 vs Radeon R7 A265
- Quadro FX 3800 vs GeForce GT 645M
- Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics vs Radeon R7 A265
- Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics vs GeForce GT 645M