Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics vs Tesla M2070 Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics and Tesla M2070 Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics and Tesla M2070 Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla M2070 Q
Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics here:
Main Specs
Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics is 146 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics is manufactured by 32 / 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M2070 Q is 1332 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Battlefield 5 is 71% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 20% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Dota 2 is 25% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Far Cry 5 is 75% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Fortnite is 53% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 85% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 28% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Metro Exodus is 150% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Minecraft is 11% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics. | ||
low / 768p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 160% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 30−33 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M2070 Q in World of Tanks is 10% more, than Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics. |
Full Specs
Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | Fermi | |
Code name | GF100 | |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 1 August 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 768 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 720 / 775 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 / 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.14 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,027.7 gflops | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 - 2000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 150.3 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | DirectX 11, Shader 5.0 | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 94 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics vs Radeon R7 A265
- Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics vs GeForce GT 645M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon R7 A265
- Tesla M2070 Q vs GeForce GT 645M
- Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics vs Radeon R9 M370X
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon HD 8790M
- Tesla M2070 Q vs Radeon R9 M370X