FirePro V5800 vs Radeon HD 8750M
In this comparison between FirePro V5800 and Radeon HD 8750M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro V5800 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 8750M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro V5800
Radeon HD 8750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8750M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Radeon HD 8750M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5, DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon HD 8750M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon HD 8750M has 1 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 8750M - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon HD 8750M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 70 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8750M.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 8750M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro V5800 is 2000 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8750M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Battlefield 5 is 133% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8750M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 29% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8750M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Dota 2 is 25% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Fortnite is 50% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Forza Horizon 4 is 128% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | − |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 43% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Metro Exodus is 250% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 220% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro V5800 in World of Tanks is 24% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | Radeon HD 8750M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN |
| Code name | Juniper | Mars Pro |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 16 November 2012 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 620 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 18.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 595.2 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 2000 - 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 71 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |