GeForce GTX 460 SE vs Radeon HD 8750M
In this comparison between GeForce GTX 460 SE and Radeon HD 8750M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTX 460 SE will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 8750M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
Radeon HD 8750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8750M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon HD 8750M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5, DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon HD 8750M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon HD 8750M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 8750M - in Laptops.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is build with Fermi architecture, and Radeon HD 8750M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 680 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8750M.
- GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 8750M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 8750M is 300 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 233% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8750M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 130−140 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 63% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8750M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GTX 460 SE. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 59% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 95% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 242% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 93% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 450% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 333% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 35−40 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 380% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 40−45 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 43% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 460 SE | Radeon HD 8750M | |
| Architecture | Fermi | GCN |
| Code name | GF104 | Mars Pro |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 November 2010 | 16 November 2012 |
| Pipelines | 288 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1300 MHz | 620 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,950 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.2 billion/sec | 18.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 748.8 gflops | 595.2 gflops |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1700 MHz | 2000 - 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 108.8 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 288 | |
| Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| SLI options | + | |
| Multi monitor support | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 48 Mh/s | 71 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Number of display connectors | 2 | |
| Check Price |