GRID K260Q vs Radeon HD 8750M
When comparing GRID K260Q and Radeon HD 8750M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID K260Q and Radeon HD 8750M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K260Q
Radeon HD 8750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8750M here:
Main Specs
| GRID K260Q | Radeon HD 8750M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5, DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K260Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 8750M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID K260Q and Radeon HD 8750M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GRID K260Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 8750M - in Laptops.
- GRID K260Q is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 8750M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GRID K260Q is 125 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8750M.
- GRID K260Q and Radeon HD 8750M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 3000 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8750M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 316% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 466% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8750M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GRID K260Q. | ||
| low / 768p | 210−220 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 180−190 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 140−150 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 119% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 60−65 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 104% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 475% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 206% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 75−80 | − |
| high / 1080p | 30−33 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 175% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 750% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 82% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 533% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 30−35 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 620% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 72% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID K260Q | Radeon HD 8750M | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN |
| Code name | GK104 | Mars Pro |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 28 June 2013 | 16 November 2012 |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 620 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 | 18.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 595.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 2000 - 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 71 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |