GRID M60 8Q vs Radeon HD 8750M
In this comparison between GRID M60 8Q and Radeon HD 8750M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GRID M60 8Q will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 8750M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GRID M60 8Q
Radeon HD 8750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8750M here:
Main Specs
| GRID M60 8Q | Radeon HD 8750M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5, DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID M60 8Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 8750M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID M60 8Q has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 8750M.
- GRID M60 8Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 8750M - in Laptops.
- GRID M60 8Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 8750M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 8750M is 63 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
- GRID M60 8Q and Radeon HD 8750M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 3012 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8750M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 416% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 633% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GRID M60 8Q and Radeon HD 8750M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 150% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 29% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 131% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 675% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 293% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 542% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 237% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 1000% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 43% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 105% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 700% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 860% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 70% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
Full Specs
| GRID M60 8Q | Radeon HD 8750M | |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GM204 | Mars Pro |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 August 2015 | 16 November 2012 |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 620 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 18.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 595.2 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 2000 - 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 71 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |