Quadro FX 4800 vs Radeon HD 8750M
In this comparison between Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon HD 8750M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Quadro FX 4800 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 8750M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Quadro FX 4800
Radeon HD 8750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8750M here:
Main Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon HD 8750M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5, DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 4800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon HD 8750M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Quadro FX 4800 has 1534 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 8750M.
- Quadro FX 4800 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 8750M - in Laptops.
- Quadro FX 4800 is build with Tesla 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 8750M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 8750M is 18 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
- Quadro FX 4800 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 8750M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 8750M is 400 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 4800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Battlefield 5 is 33% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8750M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro FX 4800. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 9% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon HD 8750M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Dota 2 is 9% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon HD 8750M have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Fortnite is 20% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Forza Horizon 4 is 42% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 5% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 4800 in World of Tanks is 2% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
Full Specs
| Quadro FX 4800 | Radeon HD 8750M | |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN |
| Code name | GT200B | Mars Pro |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 11 November 2008 | 16 November 2012 |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 602 MHz | 620 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,400 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 38.53 | 18.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 462.3 gflops | 595.2 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 2000 - 4000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 71 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |