Radeon HD 8750M vs Radeon Pro 570
When choosing between Radeon HD 8750M and Radeon Pro 570, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon HD 8750M and Radeon Pro 570.
Radeon Pro 570
Radeon HD 8750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8750M here:
Main Specs
Radeon HD 8750M | Radeon Pro 570 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5, DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 8750M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon Pro 570 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro 570 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 8750M.
- Radeon HD 8750M is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro 570 - in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 8750M is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon Pro 570 - with GCN 4.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 570 is 380 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8750M.
- Radeon HD 8750M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 570 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 570 is 4780 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8750M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Battlefield 5 is 1083% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon HD 8750M and Radeon Pro 570 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 211% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
Radeon HD 8750M and Radeon Pro 570 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Dota 2 is 161% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Fortnite is 526% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1014% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1300% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
low / 768p | 7−8 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 6−7 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1700% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 570 in World of Tanks is 81% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. |
Full Specs
Radeon HD 8750M | Radeon Pro 570 | |
Architecture | GCN | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Mars Pro | Polaris 20 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 16 November 2012 | 5 June 2017 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1792 |
Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Boost Clock | 775 MHz | 1105 MHz |
Transistor count | 950 million | 5,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 18.60 | 123.8 |
Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops | 3,584 gflops |
Length | 241 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 - 4000 MHz | 6780 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 217.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 71 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |