Radeon HD 8750M vs Radeon R9 370
When comparing Radeon HD 8750M and Radeon R9 370, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon HD 8750M and Radeon R9 370 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon R9 370
Radeon HD 8750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8750M here:
Main Specs
Radeon HD 8750M | Radeon R9 370 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5, DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 8750M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 370 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 8750M and Radeon R9 370 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Radeon HD 8750M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 370 - in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 8750M is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon R9 370 - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 305 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8750M.
- Radeon HD 8750M and Radeon R9 370 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 370 is 3600 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8750M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Battlefield 5 is 1083% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Radeon HD 8750M and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 211% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
Radeon HD 8750M and Radeon R9 370 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Dota 2 is 161% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 9−10 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Fortnite is 526% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1014% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 2−3 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 3−4 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1300% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
low / 768p | 7−8 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 6−7 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1700% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 370 in World of Tanks is 81% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. |
Full Specs
Radeon HD 8750M | Radeon R9 370 | |
Architecture | GCN | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Mars Pro | Trinidad |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 16 November 2012 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 384 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 925 MHz |
Boost Clock | 775 MHz | 975 MHz |
Transistor count | 950 million | 2,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 18.60 | 78.00 |
Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
Length | 221 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 - 4000 MHz | 5600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 179.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 71 Mh/s | 336 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |