Radeon HD 8750M vs Radeon R9 M270X
When choosing between Radeon HD 8750M and Radeon R9 M270X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon HD 8750M and Radeon R9 M270X.
Radeon R9 M270X
Radeon HD 8750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8750M here:
Main Specs
| Radeon HD 8750M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5, DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 8750M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Radeon R9 M270X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M270X has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 8750M.
- Radeon HD 8750M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 8750M is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M270X is 105 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8750M.
- Radeon HD 8750M and Radeon R9 M270X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 8750M is 875 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Battlefield 5 is 166% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8750M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 29% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8750M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Dota 2 is 25% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Far Cry 5 is 150% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | − |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Fortnite is 55% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Forza Horizon 4 is 142% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Grand Theft Auto V is 50% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Metro Exodus is 300% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Minecraft is 25% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 17% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 240% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M270X in World of Tanks is 24% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon HD 8750M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
| Architecture | GCN | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Mars Pro | Venus |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 16 November 2012 | 21 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | 775 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.60 | 31.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 - 4000 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 71 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Check Price |