Radeon HD 8750M vs Tesla M10
In this comparison between Radeon HD 8750M and Tesla M10 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon HD 8750M will be the best choice, for others Tesla M10 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M10
Radeon HD 8750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8750M here:
Main Specs
| Radeon HD 8750M | Tesla M10 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5, DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 8750M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M10 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M10 has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 8750M.
- Radeon HD 8750M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 8750M is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 413 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8750M.
- Radeon HD 8750M and Tesla M10 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M10 is 3200 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8750M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 400% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 566% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 134% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 120% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 600% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 253% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−33 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 500% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 212% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 950% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 32% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 94% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 600% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 7−8 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 780% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 67% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon HD 8750M | Tesla M10 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell |
| Code name | Mars Pro | GM107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 16 November 2012 | 18 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 1033 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | 1306 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.60 | 52.24 |
| Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 - 4000 MHz | 5200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 71 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |