Radeon HD 8750M vs Tesla T4
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between Radeon HD 8750M and Tesla T4, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the Radeon HD 8750M stacks up against Tesla T4, check out specs charts below.
Tesla T4
Radeon HD 8750M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8750M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8750M here:
Main Specs
| Radeon HD 8750M | Tesla T4 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 70 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5, DDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 8750M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla T4 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla T4 has 14 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 8750M.
- Radeon HD 8750M is used in Laptops, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 8750M is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 8750M is 35 MHz higher, than Tesla T4.
- Radeon HD 8750M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla T4 is 8000 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8750M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 766% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 1083% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon HD 8750M and Tesla T4 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 110−120 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 211% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| Radeon HD 8750M and Tesla T4 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 161% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 1275% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 526% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 1014% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 40−45 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 30−35 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 418% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 1−2 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 2−3 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 1950% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 170% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 3−4 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1300% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 7−8 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 6−7 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 1700% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 81% more, than Radeon HD 8750M. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon HD 8750M | Tesla T4 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Turing |
| Code name | Mars Pro | TU104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 16 November 2012 | 13 September 2018 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 620 MHz | 585 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | 1590 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 13,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.60 | 254.4 |
| Floating-point performance | 595.2 gflops | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 - 4000 MHz | 10000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 71 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |