FirePro S7000 vs Radeon HD 8770M
When comparing FirePro S7000 and Radeon HD 8770M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro S7000 and Radeon HD 8770M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FirePro S7000
Radeon HD 8770M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8770M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8770M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S7000 | Radeon HD 8770M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 350 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro S7000 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 8770M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro S7000 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 8770M.
- FirePro S7000 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 8770M - in Laptops.
- FirePro S7000 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 8770M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 175 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8770M.
- FirePro S7000 and Radeon HD 8770M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro S7000 is 300 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8770M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 188% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Battlefield 5 is 180% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 95−100 | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 170−180 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 94% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Dota 2 is 78% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 20−22 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Far Cry 5 is 222% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Fortnite is 132% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 127% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Minecraft is 26% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 59% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 169% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 20−22 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S7000 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. |
Full Specs
FirePro S7000 | Radeon HD 8770M | |
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN |
Code name | Pitcairn | Mars |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 27 August 2012 | 16 November 2012 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 950 MHz | 775 MHz |
Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 76.00 | 19.80 |
Floating-point performance | 2,432 gflops | 633.6 gflops |
Length | 292 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 4500 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 272 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
DisplayPort count | 1 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |