Radeon HD 8770M vs Tesla M10
When comparing Radeon HD 8770M and Tesla M10, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon HD 8770M and Tesla M10 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M10
Radeon HD 8770M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8770M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8770M here:
Main Specs
Radeon HD 8770M | Tesla M10 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 8770M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M10 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M10 has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 8770M.
- Radeon HD 8770M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M10 - in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 8770M is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla M10 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M10 is 258 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8770M.
- Radeon HD 8770M and Tesla M10 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M10 is 700 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8770M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 144% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Battlefield 5 is 146% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 80−85 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 72% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Dota 2 is 61% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Far Cry 5 is 166% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Fortnite is 103% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Forza Horizon 4 is 146% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Grand Theft Auto V is 103% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Minecraft is 21% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
low / 768p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 130% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla M10 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. |
Full Specs
Radeon HD 8770M | Tesla M10 | |
Architecture | GCN | Maxwell |
Code name | Mars | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 16 November 2012 | 18 May 2016 |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 1033 MHz |
Boost Clock | 825 MHz | 1306 MHz |
Transistor count | 950 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 19.80 | 52.24 |
Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | 4x 1,672 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 5200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 83.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 5.0 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |