Radeon HD 8770M vs Tesla M6
When choosing between Radeon HD 8770M and Tesla M6, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between Radeon HD 8770M and Tesla M6.
Tesla M6
Radeon HD 8770M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8770M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8770M here:
Main Specs
| Radeon HD 8770M | Tesla M6 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 8770M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and Tesla M6 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M6 has 6 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 8770M.
- Radeon HD 8770M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 8770M is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M6 is 155 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8770M.
- Radeon HD 8770M and Tesla M6 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M6 is 512 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8770M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 388% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 400% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−33 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| high / 768p | 80−85 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 139% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 91% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 466% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 292% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 430% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 237% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 485% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 36% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 109% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 340% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
| low / 768p | 24−27 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 415% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 34% more, than Radeon HD 8770M. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon HD 8770M | Tesla M6 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Mars | GM204 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 16 November 2012 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 825 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 19.80 | 113.3 |
| Floating-point performance | 633.6 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |