Radeon HD 8790M vs Tesla T4
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon HD 8790M and Tesla T4. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon HD 8790M and Tesla T4. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla T4
Radeon HD 8790M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8790M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8790M here:
Main Specs
| Radeon HD 8790M | Tesla T4 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 70 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 8790M is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and Tesla T4 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla T4 has 14 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 8790M.
- Radeon HD 8790M is used in Laptops, and Tesla T4 - in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 8790M is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 8790M is 265 MHz higher, than Tesla T4.
- Radeon HD 8790M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla T4 is 5500 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8790M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 583% more, than Radeon HD 8790M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 518% more, than Radeon HD 8790M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon HD 8790M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 158% more, than Radeon HD 8790M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon HD 8790M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 109% more, than Radeon HD 8790M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 683% more, than Radeon HD 8790M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 314% more, than Radeon HD 8790M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 483% more, than Radeon HD 8790M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 277% more, than Radeon HD 8790M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 720% more, than Radeon HD 8790M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 55% more, than Radeon HD 8790M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 130% more, than Radeon HD 8790M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 414% more, than Radeon HD 8790M. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 588% more, than Radeon HD 8790M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than Radeon HD 8790M. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon HD 8790M | Tesla T4 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Turing |
| Code name | Mars XTX | TU104 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 16 November 2012 | 13 September 2018 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 585 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1590 MHz |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 13,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 254.4 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 10000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 80 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |