Radeon HD 8870M vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
In this comparison between Radeon HD 8870M and Radeon R5 430 OEM you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon HD 8870M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R5 430 OEM will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
Radeon HD 8870M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8870M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8870M here:
Main Specs
| Radeon HD 8870M | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5, DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 8870M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon HD 8870M and Radeon R5 430 OEM have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- Radeon HD 8870M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 8870M is build with GCN architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 5 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8870M.
- Radeon HD 8870M and Radeon R5 430 OEM are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R5 430 OEM is 100 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8870M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8870M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8870M in Battlefield 5 is 125% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| Radeon HD 8870M and Radeon R5 430 OEM have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8870M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8870M in Dota 2 is 31% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8870M in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8870M in Fortnite is 66% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8870M in Forza Horizon 4 is 112% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8870M in Grand Theft Auto V is 40% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8870M in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8870M in Minecraft is 16% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8870M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 29% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8870M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8870M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 128% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8870M in World of Tanks is 17% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon HD 8870M | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Architecture | GCN | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | Venus | Oland |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 18 December 2012 | 30 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.00 | 18.72 |
| Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 107 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |