Radeon HD 8870M vs Tesla C2070
When comparing Radeon HD 8870M and Tesla C2070, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon HD 8870M and Tesla C2070 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla C2070
Radeon HD 8870M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8870M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8870M here:
Main Specs
| Radeon HD 8870M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5, DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Radeon HD 8870M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 8870M.
- Radeon HD 8870M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 8870M is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 8870M is 151 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- Radeon HD 8870M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 8870M is 1512 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 118% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 85−90 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 62% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 28% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 56% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 80% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 114% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 77% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 128% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 72% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than Radeon HD 8870M. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon HD 8870M | Tesla C2070 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
| Code name | Venus | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 18 December 2012 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,500 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.00 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 992.0 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.0 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 107 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |