FirePro W8100 vs Radeon HD 8970M
In this comparison between FirePro W8100 and Radeon HD 8970M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W8100 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 8970M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W8100
Radeon HD 8970M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8970M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8970M here:
Main Specs
FirePro W8100 | Radeon HD 8970M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W8100 has 120% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 8970M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FirePro W8100 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 8970M.
- FirePro W8100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 8970M - in Laptops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon HD 8970M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 8970M is 26 MHz higher, than FirePro W8100.
- FirePro W8100 and Radeon HD 8970M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 200 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8970M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than Radeon HD 8970M. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 83% more, than Radeon HD 8970M. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W8100 and Radeon HD 8970M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than Radeon HD 8970M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FirePro W8100 and Radeon HD 8970M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Radeon HD 8970M. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than Radeon HD 8970M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 61% more, than Radeon HD 8970M. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 80% more, than Radeon HD 8970M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than Radeon HD 8970M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 93% more, than Radeon HD 8970M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon HD 8970M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Radeon HD 8970M. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 92% more, than Radeon HD 8970M. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 87% more, than Radeon HD 8970M. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 6% more, than Radeon HD 8970M. |
Full Specs
FirePro W8100 | Radeon HD 8970M | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | GCN |
Code name | Hawaii | Neptune |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2014 | 15 May 2013 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 850 MHz |
Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 2,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 72.00 |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 2,304 gflops |
Length | 279 mm | |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 153.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | 273 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |