Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs Radeon HD 8970M
In this comparison between Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Radeon HD 8970M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Iris Plus Graphics 645 will be the best choice, for others Radeon HD 8970M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Radeon HD 8970M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: Iris Plus Graphics 645 and Radeon HD 8970M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Plus Graphics 645 or Radeon HD 8970M here:
Main Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Radeon HD 8970M
Power consumption (TDP)
15 Watt
100 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type
DDR3/DDR4
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon HD 8970M has 566% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x1, and Radeon HD 8970M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is build with Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake architecture, and Radeon HD 8970M - with GCN.
Core clock speed of Radeon HD 8970M is 550 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Iris Plus Graphics 645 is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 8970M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
20−22
ultra / 1080p
2−3
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
12−14
35−40
medium / 1080p
5−6
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
−
30−35
ultra / 1080p
7−8
27−30
QHD / 1440p
0−1
10−12
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
16−18
65−70
medium / 1080p
8−9
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Battlefield 5 is 300% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
100−110
230−240
medium / 768p
80−85
200−210
ultra / 1080p
35−40
110−120
QHD / 1440p
24−27
85−90
4K / 2160p
−
45−50
high / 768p
60−65
160−170
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 159% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
55−60
60−65
ultra / 1080p
12−14
50−55
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 46% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
65−70
120−130
medium / 768p
45−50
100−110
ultra / 1080p
21−24
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Dota 2 is 126% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
5−6
24−27
ultra / 1080p
5−6
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
3−4
7−8
low / 720p
12−14
50−55
medium / 1080p
5−6
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Far Cry 5 is 333% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
12−14
30−35
ultra / 1080p
8−9
24−27
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
45−50
120−130
medium / 1080p
12−14
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Fortnite is 215% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
8−9
30−35
ultra / 1080p
−
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
12−14
low / 720p
16−18
65−70
medium / 1080p
9−10
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Forza Horizon 4 is 309% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
40−45
100−110
medium / 768p
35−40
90−95
high / 1080p
7−8
40−45
ultra / 1080p
5−6
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Grand Theft Auto V is 178% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
3−4
12−14
ultra / 1080p
2−3
10−11
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
7−8
35−40
medium / 1080p
4−5
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Metro Exodus is 375% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
85−90
120−130
high / 1080p
80−85
−
ultra / 1080p
70−75
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Minecraft is 43% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
24−27
70−75
medium / 1080p
16−18
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 84% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
7−8
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
20−22
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 242% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
16−18
70−75
medium / 768p
12−14
45−50
high / 1080p
6−7
24−27
ultra / 1080p
5−6
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 300% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
low / 768p
80−85
90−95
medium / 768p
35−40
60−65
ultra / 1080p
14−16
40−45
high / 768p
30−33
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 645.
Full Specs
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Radeon HD 8970M
Architecture
Gen. 9.5 Coffee Lake
GCN
Code name
Kaby Lake GT3e
Neptune
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
10 July 2019
15 May 2013
Pipelines
48
1280
Core clock speed
300 MHz
850 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
900 MHz
Transistor count
2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology
14 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
50.40
72.00
Floating-point performance
2,304 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
4800 MHz
Memory bandwidth
153.6 GB/s
Shared memory
+
-
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
6.4
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.103
1.2.131
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
273 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Quick Sync
+
Check Price
Check Price