Radeon HD 8970M vs Tesla M2070 Q
When comparing Radeon HD 8970M and Tesla M2070 Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between Radeon HD 8970M and Tesla M2070 Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Tesla M2070 Q
Radeon HD 8970M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8970M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8970M here:
Main Specs
Radeon HD 8970M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Tesla M2070 Q has 125% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 8970M.
- Radeon HD 8970M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla M2070 Q uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla M2070 Q has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 8970M.
- Radeon HD 8970M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M2070 Q - in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 8970M is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla M2070 Q - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 8970M is 276 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
- Radeon HD 8970M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla M2070 Q - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon HD 8970M is 1668 MHz higher, than Tesla M2070 Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 20−22 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 300% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Battlefield 5 is 272% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 230−240 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 200−210 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 45−50 | − |
high / 768p | 160−170 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 109% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 26% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Dota 2 is 85% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Far Cry 5 is 333% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Fortnite is 157% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Forza Horizon 4 is 233% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 90−95 | − |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Grand Theft Auto V is 145% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Metro Exodus is 340% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Minecraft is 43% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 75% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 200% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 20−22 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 266% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 8970M in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Tesla M2070 Q. |
Full Specs
Radeon HD 8970M | Tesla M2070 Q | |
Architecture | GCN | Fermi |
Code name | Neptune | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 15 May 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 1280 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 574 MHz |
Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,800 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 72.00 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 2,304 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
CUDA | 2.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 273 Mh/s | 94 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |