Radeon HD 8970M vs Tesla M6
In this comparison between Radeon HD 8970M and Tesla M6 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people Radeon HD 8970M will be the best choice, for others Tesla M6 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Tesla M6
Radeon HD 8970M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8970M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8970M here:
Main Specs
| Radeon HD 8970M | Tesla M6 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 100 Watt.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- Tesla M6 has 4 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 8970M.
- Radeon HD 8970M is used in Laptops, and Tesla M6 - in Desktops.
- Radeon HD 8970M is build with GCN architecture, and Tesla M6 - with Maxwell 2.0.
- Core clock speed of Tesla M6 is 80 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8970M.
- Radeon HD 8970M and Tesla M6 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla M6 is 212 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8970M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 94% more, than Radeon HD 8970M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Battlefield 5 is 100% more, than Radeon HD 8970M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Radeon HD 8970M and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 230−240 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 200−210 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 110−120 | 190−200 |
| QHD / 1440p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| 4K / 2160p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| high / 768p | 160−170 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 28% more, than Radeon HD 8970M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| Radeon HD 8970M and Tesla M6 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Radeon HD 8970M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Far Cry 5 is 92% more, than Radeon HD 8970M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
| medium / 1080p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Fortnite is 74% more, than Radeon HD 8970M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Forza Horizon 4 is 96% more, than Radeon HD 8970M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Grand Theft Auto V is 61% more, than Radeon HD 8970M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Metro Exodus is 118% more, than Radeon HD 8970M. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Radeon HD 8970M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 31% more, than Radeon HD 8970M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 114% more, than Radeon HD 8970M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 103% more, than Radeon HD 8970M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 55−60 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla M6 in World of Tanks is 7% more, than Radeon HD 8970M. | ||
Full Specs
| Radeon HD 8970M | Tesla M6 | |
| Architecture | GCN | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Neptune | GM204 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 15 May 2013 | 30 August 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1536 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,800 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 72.00 | 113.3 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,304 gflops | 3,625 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4800 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 273 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |