Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs Tesla C2050

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU and Tesla C2050. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU and Tesla C2050. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU

Tesla C2050

Main Specs

	Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU	Tesla C2050
Power consumption (TDP)	300 Watt	238 Watt
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	2x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	3 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI

Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU has 26% more power consumption, than Tesla C2050.
Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU has 13 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is build with GCN 5.0 architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is 826 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is manufactured by 14 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU is 19 mm longer, than Tesla C2050.
Memory clock speed of Tesla C2050 is 1296 MHz higher, than Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	50−55	18−20
ultra / 1080p	35−40	10−11
QHD / 1440p	27−30	4−5
4K / 2160p	16−18	4−5
low / 720p	80−85	35−40
medium / 1080p	60−65	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 187% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	80−85	27−30
ultra / 1080p	75−80	24−27
QHD / 1440p	55−60	8−9
4K / 2160p	30−33	6−7
low / 720p	130−140	60−65
medium / 1080p	95−100	30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU in Battlefield 5 is 196% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	50−55
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU.
low / 768p	250−260	220−230
medium / 768p	230−240	190−200
ultra / 1080p	−	110−120
QHD / 1440p	150−160	70−75
4K / 2160p	100−110	35−40
high / 768p	220−230	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 42% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	−	45−50
medium / 1080p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 768p	110−120	100−110
ultra / 1080p	110−120	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU in Dota 2 is 21% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	65−70	21−24
ultra / 1080p	65−70	20−22
QHD / 1440p	45−50	18−20
4K / 2160p	24−27	7−8
low / 720p	100−110	45−50
medium / 1080p	70−75	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU in Far Cry 5 is 178% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	100−105	27−30
ultra / 1080p	75−80	21−24
QHD / 1440p	50−55	14−16
4K / 2160p	21−24	−
low / 720p	220−230	110−120
medium / 1080p	150−160	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU in Fortnite is 154% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	90−95	30−35
ultra / 1080p	70−75	21−24
QHD / 1440p	50−55	10−12
4K / 2160p	35−40	−
low / 720p	140−150	60−65
medium / 1080p	95−100	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU in Forza Horizon 4 is 178% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	160−170	95−100
medium / 768p	150−160	85−90
high / 1080p	100−110	35−40
ultra / 1080p	50−55	14−16
QHD / 1440p	45−50	5−6
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	40−45	10−12
ultra / 1080p	30−35	9−10
QHD / 1440p	24−27	−
4K / 2160p	16−18	2−3
low / 720p	100−105	35−40
medium / 1080p	55−60	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU in Metro Exodus is 233% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	120−130	110−120
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU in Minecraft is 8% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	85−90	−
ultra / 1080p	60−65	14−16
4K / 2160p	18−20	−
low / 720p	130−140	65−70
medium / 1080p	95−100	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 196% more, than Tesla C2050.
high / 1080p	40−45	14−16
ultra / 1080p	24−27	9−10
QHD / 1440p	18−20	0−1
4K / 2160p	12−14	−
low / 720p	100−105	35−40
medium / 1080p	60−65	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 190% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	200−210	65−70
medium / 768p	130−140	40−45
high / 1080p	75−80	21−24
ultra / 1080p	40−45	12−14
4K / 2160p	27−30	7−8
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 223% more, than Tesla C2050.
low / 768p	130−140	90−95
medium / 768p	−	60−65
ultra / 1080p	65−70	35−40
high / 768p	−	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU in World of Tanks is 55% more, than Tesla C2050.

Full Specs

	Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU	Tesla C2050
Architecture	GCN 5.0	Fermi
Code name	Vega 10	GF100
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	27 June 2017	25 July 2011
Pipelines	4096	448
Core clock speed	1400 MHz	574 MHz
Boost Clock	1500 MHz
Transistor count	12,500 million	3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	40 nm
Texture fill rate	384.0	32.14
Floating-point performance		1,030.4 gflops
Length	267 mm	248 mm
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1704 MHz	3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	436.2 GB/s	144.0 GB/s
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.125	N/A
CUDA		2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		90 Mh/s

Radeon Instinct MI25 MxGPU vs Tesla C2050

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares