FirePro W5100 vs Radeon Pro 450
When choosing between FirePro W5100 and Radeon Pro 450, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro W5100 and Radeon Pro 450.
FirePro W5100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro 450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 450 here:
Main Specs
FirePro W5100 | Radeon Pro 450 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FirePro W5100 has 42% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 450.
- FirePro W5100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 450 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FirePro W5100 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon Pro 450.
- FirePro W5100 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 450 - in Mobile workstations.
- FirePro W5100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 450 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 130 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 450.
- FirePro W5100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 450 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W5100 is 920 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 450.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 14% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro W5100 and Radeon Pro 450 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 210−220 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 180−190 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−105 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 140−150 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 5% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Dota 2 is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Far Cry 5 is 16% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Fortnite is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 7% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Metro Exodus is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 110−120 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
FirePro W5100 and Radeon Pro 450 have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W5100 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than Radeon Pro 450. |
Full Specs
FirePro W5100 | Radeon Pro 450 | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | Bonaire | Polaris 11 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 31 March 2014 | 27 October 2016 |
Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 800 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,080 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 44.64 | 32.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,428 gflops | 1,024 gflops |
Length | 171 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 163 Mh/s | 127 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | full height / half length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Check Price |