FireStream 9250 vs Radeon Pro 450
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9250 and Radeon Pro 450, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9250 stacks up against Radeon Pro 450, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9250
Radeon Pro 450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 450 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | Radeon Pro 450 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 328% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 450.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 450 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 450 has 1 GB more memory, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 450 - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon Pro 450 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 175 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 450 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 3094 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 240% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Battlefield 5 is 211% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Dota 2 is 65% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Far Cry 5 is 260% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Fortnite is 129% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Forza Horizon 4 is 172% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Grand Theft Auto V is 90% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Metro Exodus is 325% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Minecraft is 26% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 200% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in World of Tanks is 44% more, than FireStream 9250. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | Radeon Pro 450 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Polaris |
Code name | RV770 | Polaris 11 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 27 October 2016 |
Pipelines | 800 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 800 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 32.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 1,024 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 127 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |