GeForce 820A vs Radeon Pro 450
When choosing between GeForce 820A and Radeon Pro 450, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 820A and Radeon Pro 450.
GeForce 820A
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Radeon Pro 450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 450 here:
Main Specs
GeForce 820A | Radeon Pro 450 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 450 has 133% more power consumption, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 450 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 450 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 450 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 450 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 25 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 450 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 3280 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 439% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 820A in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Dota 2 is 237% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Fortnite is 318% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Grand Theft Auto V is 331% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than GeForce 820A. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than GeForce 820A. |
Full Specs
GeForce 820A | Radeon Pro 450 | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | GF117 | Polaris 11 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 27 October 2016 |
Pipelines | 96 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 800 MHz |
Transistor count | 585 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 12.40 | 32.00 |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 1,024 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 127 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |