GeForce 830A vs Radeon Pro 450
When choosing between GeForce 830A and Radeon Pro 450, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce 830A and Radeon Pro 450.
GeForce 830A
Radeon Pro 450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 450 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 830A | Radeon Pro 450 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro 450 has 6% more power consumption, than GeForce 830A.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x8 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce 830A and Radeon Pro 450 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce 830A is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 450 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce 830A is build with Maxwell architecture, and Radeon Pro 450 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 830A is 282 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 450.
- GeForce 830A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 450 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 3280 MHz higher, than GeForce 830A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 233% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Battlefield 5 is 233% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce 830A in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 65−70 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 85% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Dota 2 is 75% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Far Cry 5 is 350% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Fortnite is 143% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Forza Horizon 4 is 200% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 720p | 35−40 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Grand Theft Auto V is 122% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 4−5 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Metro Exodus is 466% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Minecraft is 28% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| low / 768p | 10−11 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 380% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in World of Tanks is 58% more, than GeForce 830A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 830A | Radeon Pro 450 | |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Polaris |
| Code name | GM108 | Polaris 11 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 22 July 2014 | 27 October 2016 |
| Pipelines | 256 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 1082 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1150 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 3,000 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 18.40 | 32.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 588.8 gflops | 1,024 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 127 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |