GeForce GTX 460 v2 vs Radeon Pro 450
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon Pro 450, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTX 460 v2 stacks up against Radeon Pro 450, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTX 460 v2
Radeon Pro 450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 450 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon Pro 450 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 357% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 450.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 450 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 450 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 450 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 450 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 21 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
- GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 450 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 1072 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 v2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Battlefield 5 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTX 460 v2 and Radeon Pro 450 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 160−170 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 70−75 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Dota 2 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Far Cry 5 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Fortnite is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Forza Horizon 4 is 38% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 65−70 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Metro Exodus is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Minecraft is 10% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 20−22 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in World of Tanks is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 460 v2. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTX 460 v2 | Radeon Pro 450 | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | GF114 | Polaris 11 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 24 September 2011 | 27 October 2016 |
Pipelines | 336 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 779 MHz | 800 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,950 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 43.62 | 32.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,045.6 gflops | 1,024 gflops |
Length | 210 mm | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 2.1 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 75 Mh/s | 127 Mh/s |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |