GeForce GTX 760A vs Radeon Pro 450
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon Pro 450. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon Pro 450. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTX 760A
Radeon Pro 450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 450 here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon Pro 450 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760A has 57% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 450.
- GeForce GTX 760A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 450 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon Pro 450 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GeForce GTX 760A is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 450 - in Mobile workstations.
- GeForce GTX 760A is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 450 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 172 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
- GeForce GTX 760A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 450 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 1072 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760A.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Battlefield 5 is 154% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTX 760A and Radeon Pro 450 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 73% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Dota 2 is 56% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Far Cry 5 is 200% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Fortnite is 95% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Grand Theft Auto V is 81% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Metro Exodus is 240% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 30−33 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 128% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 166% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than GeForce GTX 760A. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTX 760A | Radeon Pro 450 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Polaris |
| Code name | GK106 | Polaris 11 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 17 March 2014 | 27 October 2016 |
| Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 628 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 657 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,540 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 42.05 | 32.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,009 gflops | 1,024 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4008 MHz | 5080 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64.13 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 3.0 | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 127 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |