GRID M60 2Q vs Radeon Pro 450
When comparing GRID M60 2Q and Radeon Pro 450, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GRID M60 2Q and Radeon Pro 450 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID M60 2Q
Radeon Pro 450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 450 here:
Main Specs
GRID M60 2Q | Radeon Pro 450 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID M60 2Q has 542% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 450.
- GRID M60 2Q is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 450 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- GRID M60 2Q and Radeon Pro 450 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- GRID M60 2Q is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 450 - in Mobile workstations.
- GRID M60 2Q is build with Maxwell 2.0 architecture, and Radeon Pro 450 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 243 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
- GRID M60 2Q is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 450 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 68 MHz higher, than GRID M60 2Q.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 157% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Battlefield 5 is 170% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 53% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Dota 2 is 33% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Far Cry 5 is 161% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Fortnite is 123% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 152% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 102% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Metro Exodus is 158% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Minecraft is 18% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 125% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 158% more, than Radeon Pro 450. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−105 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 2Q in World of Tanks is 8% more, than Radeon Pro 450. |
Full Specs
GRID M60 2Q | Radeon Pro 450 | |
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Polaris |
Code name | GM204 | Polaris 11 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 30 August 2015 | 27 October 2016 |
Pipelines | 2048 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 557 MHz | 800 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 150.8 | 32.00 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 1,024 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5080 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 5.2 | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 127 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |