NVS 510 vs Radeon Pro 450
In this comparison between NVS 510 and Radeon Pro 450 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people NVS 510 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 450 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon Pro 450 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 450 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 450 here:
Main Specs
NVS 510
Radeon Pro 450
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
4x mini-DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 35 Watt.
NVS 510 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 450 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
NVS 510 and Radeon Pro 450 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
NVS 510 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 450 - in Mobile workstations.
NVS 510 is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon Pro 450 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 3 MHz higher, than NVS 510.
NVS 510 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 450 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 450 is 3298 MHz higher, than NVS 510.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
1−2
27−30
medium / 1080p
0−1
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
0−1
45−50
medium / 1080p
−
24−27
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
low / 768p
60−65
200−210
medium / 768p
27−30
170−180
ultra / 1080p
7−8
90−95
QHD / 1440p
−
50−55
4K / 2160p
−
30−33
high / 768p
16−18
130−140
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 439% more, than NVS 510.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of NVS 510 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
low / 768p
45−50
100−110
medium / 768p
10−11
90−95
ultra / 1080p
0−1
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Dota 2 is 237% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
0−1
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
21−24
90−95
medium / 1080p
0−1
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Fortnite is 318% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
0−1
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
0−1
45−50
medium / 1080p
0−1
27−30
low / 768p
18−20
80−85
medium / 768p
−
70−75
high / 1080p
0−1
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Grand Theft Auto V is 331% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
−
9−10
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
high / 1080p
27−30
−
ultra / 1080p
−
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Minecraft is 49% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
low / 720p
8−9
50−55
medium / 1080p
−
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than NVS 510.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 768p
0−1
50−55
medium / 768p
−
30−35
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 768p
45−50
100−105
medium / 768p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
30−35
high / 768p
12−14
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than NVS 510.
Full Specs
NVS 510
Radeon Pro 450
Architecture
Kepler
Polaris
Code name
GK107
Polaris 11
Type
Workstation
Mobile workstation
Release date
23 October 2012
27 October 2016
Pipelines
192
640
Core clock speed
797 MHz
800 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
12.75
32.00
Floating-point performance
306.0 gflops
1,024 gflops
Length
160 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
1782 MHz
5080 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.51 GB/s
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
3.0
FreeSync
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
17 Mh/s
127 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
Check Price
Check Price